You Are Here: Home » Business » The New Soylent Green Economy

The New Soylent Green Economy

 

‘Dead janitors’ or ‘dead peasants’ insurance: corporations buy secret non-disclosed life insurance policies on their workers when workers ‘give up the ghost’ 

There is nothing that is sacred under the organized system of greed known as capitalism. Everything produced and sold under the ruthless arrangement that puts profits before people must be commodified and cannibalized quickly, and at any cost.  Take life insurance, a commodity peddled by hucksters for more than a century.  The insurance has now taken a new twist.  Companies are purchasing insurance policies that will pay them a secret, windfall benefit when you die and you might not even know it.  The money will not go to your loved ones but to the corporation.  The commodification of death under capitalism goes unbridled.  One lives to survive, not survive to live and the legal ownership of life goes on unabated.

These life insurance policies, are often nicknamed ‘dead janitors’ or ‘dead peasants’ insurance, and they have increased in popularity after many states cleared the way for them by relaxing insurance regulations and passing new ones favorable to the body snatchers.  The practice accelerated during the Reagan years.  Congress recently tried to crack down on the practices, but they faced the howls of the insurance industry — which earlier this year managed to derail reforms intended to stop or regulate them through multi-million dollar lobbying efforts, perhaps paid for with death peasant’s insurance benefits.

This dirty little secret may not have been on your radar screen but it certainly is firmly locked into the rifle sites of companies that want you dead so they can collect insurance benefits on your corpse without your knowledge.  The companies can then use the death benefits to pay for higher CEO salaries, more perks for upper management or even to pay for retirement benefits for the living’.  Compost compounded daily.

If this sounds like a scene out of a B-rated horror film, it is.  It is capitalism.  But the facts themselves do not lie so let’s take a look at them.

  • Companies pay a whopping $8 billion in premiums each year for such coverage, according to the American Council of Life Insurers, a trade group.
  • The policies make up more than 20% of the all the life insurance sold each year.
  • Companies expect to reap more than $9 billion in tax breaks from these policies over the next five years. The policies are treated as whole life policies. So, companies can borrow against the policies (though the IRS won’t let them write off the interest). And the death benefits are tax-free (MSN, Liz Pulliam Weston, http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/insurance/p64954.asp).

Labor leaders and some lawmakers have denounced the policies as not simply unjust but morally reprehensible and repulsive. The companies refute this, arguing that profits from the policies can help offset the increased cost of employee benefits and enhance the businesses bottom lines.  The labor leaders and lawmakers seem to counter argue with inaction at best, a wink and a nod at worst.  Little has been done to curb the practices of the ‘death peasant insurance’ that vests its interest in your early but permanent ‘retirement’. 

Exploitation is the key principle of capitalist social relations of production. It is an economic system whereby capital employs workers and then takes a portion of what they produce as ‘surplus labor’ or profits.  This is wage-slavery, a system where workers sell or rent their labor to capital while producing more in value than is reflected in their benefits or pay.  The ‘surplus’ is taken by the corporations as profit and then paid out to a small class of investors and CEO’s.  This is the cornerstone of how profits are created and then accumulated under capitalism.  Now with your dead body worth often more than the cost of paying benefits or health insurance for your life, James Cain’s sultry novel Double Indemnity takes on an even more hideous noir.

Hundreds of companies — including Dow Chemical, Procter & Gamble, Wal-Mart, Walt Disney and Winn-Dixie –purchase dead peasant insurance on more than 6 million rank-and-file workers in the United States.

Take the following examples of how this all turns into reality for workers and their families:

Jane St. John had two children and was pregnant with a third when her husband, a butcher at a Winn-Dixie store, was killed in an auto accident. When the Killeen, Texas, woman called the company to ask about insurance, she said she was told about a $17,500 policy to which she was entitled. St. John said Winn-Dixie told her nothing about the $102,000 the company collected from a corporate-owned policy on his life. She found out about it this summer, eight years after his death, from a lawyer who researched court records. The idea that the company would secretly insure lives, and then not share the benefits with the families, “is sick,” she said. “That is creepy.”

Mike Rice was a 48-year-old assistant manager when he died of a massive heart attack at the Wal-Mart store in Tilton, N.H. His widow, Vicki, became the lead plaintiff in a class-action lawsuit against the company after she discovered Wal-Mart collected $300,000 from a life insurance policy it owned on him. Vicki Rice believes job-related stress contributed to the heart attack and says it is totally immoral for Wal-Mart to profit from his death.

No one knows how many corporate-owned policies are issued on executives versus rank-and-file workers. Wal-Mart alone had taken out about 350,000 such policies between 1993 and 1996. Nestle USA had policies on 18,000 workers in 2002, The Wall Street Journal reported. Enron had $500 million in policies on workers (ibid).

There are two large issues that public interest groups and survivors speak of when they look at these death policies.

  • Whether the companies had an insurable interest in their employees’ lives.
  • Whether the companies were required to get the employees permission for the policies.

‘Insurable interest’ is essential in determining insurance claims for the issue is to make sure whoever is buying life insurance does not have an incentive for bumping off the insured. Therefore, insurers usually require that purchasers have a strong familial or emotional connection to the people being insured, or at least that they would suffer significant financial losses if the insured people died.

However all this changed in the 1980’s when the neo-liberal state allowed companies not to simply buy insurance for their executives, as had been done earlier, but loosened the regulations to include the ability of companies to buy insurance policies for all their employees.  Evidently the ‘strong emotional connection’ these companies had to their dead workers had to do with profit and greed, capital maximization and accumulation, or ‘suffering significant financial losses’ when the worker died and the surplus value dried up. The assumption underlying the horrific death insurance plan is that the workers ‘belong’ to the corporation – like peasants and serfs belonged to the lords and nobles.
As for seeking permission on behalf of the insured for purchase of these secret policies by corporations on their lives, most states have advise and consent laws.  These laws technically require companies to get a worker’s permission before buying life insurance on their lives – ‘peasant permission’.  

Many businesses circumvent these laws as they do most laws intended to hold them accountable. In this case they do so by purchasing the dead peasant insurance in one of the states that does not require notice, counsel or consent.  These state ‘death peasant insurance’ havens include Delaware, Georgia, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Vermont. This basically means employees’ lives can be insured by contracting them out to insurance companies in rogue states that allow for the dead peasant insurance practices without any permission or counsel with and from the employee, nor any knowledge on the behalf of the worker.  These are ‘secret’ insurance policies and the employees and their loved ones may never even know if the corporation has taken a policy out on them or have collected insurance benefits when they pass. They may never find out if the corporations cash in the policies upon the worker’s death and then transfer the ‘janitor’ funds into corporate profits, retirement pay for the living but soon to be indemnified dead, or whether they just use the money for their own bonuses, perks and million dollar lifestyles.

According to attorney Mike Myers of Houstons McClanahan & Clearman, a firm which represents survivors suing companies over corporate-owned policies, the companies try their hardest to keep the life insurance policies they take out on workers secret.

Myers noted:
“Executives fly to Atlanta to meet with the insurance company and its brokers, sign some papers, get on their respective corporate jets and fly home”.

Myers went on to indicate that other corporate companies also get around the law by offering their workers typically small policies — $5,000 to $10,000.  This then serves as an incentive to allow larger corporate-owned policies to be issued on the workers lives by corporate insurance companies. The trick is that the small policies can later be canceled, even if the company keeps up the premiums on the ‘dead peasant’ insurance (ibid). 

Jack Dolan, spokesman for the insurance trade group the American Council of Life Insurers (ACL, a business ‘union’) admitted that anger about these practices will turn the burner up on needed reforms to stop the ghoulish practice.  This might even include restricting a company’s ability to write death policies on rank-and-file workers.  Most likely what Congress will do, at the very least, is to force companies to get their peasant’s consent before buying any new policies.  Corporations most likely will also have to clearly disclose that the coverage may extend past the time the worker leaves the company, which is incredibly the case now.  This is touted by the coin-operated politicians and their lobby constituents as a huge step in the right direction, but it leaves intact the whole graveyard gimmick of insuring giving up the ghost.

Acknowledging that laws may change, Dolan doggedly rejected the idea that corporate-owned ‘dead peasant’ life insurance was immoral or that a company might bet against its workers – hoping they would die so they could pocket the insurance.  From Dolan’s point of view:

”It’s an important business.  Companies are using it for extremely valid reasons” (ibid).

Yes indeed and the valid reason is greed and profit maximization, pure and simple, and an economic and social system that creates the material conditions for this type of predation.  That is why the coin-operated politicians are courted by lobbyists for the insurance industry.  Lax regulations are good, but no regulations are better and insurance kindly regulation is even more welcome.

It’s a Donner party now under capitalism.   Those who own the means of production are now fully in charge of who draw straws to see who eats whom first.  Dog eat dog could hardly describe the deracinated policies of these corporate crime syndicates who even in death, will posthumously exploit you, rummage through your pockets, collect benefits on your life through secret insurance policies and perhaps one day even trade your body parts for cash.

Arguably we are now entering a world of Soylent Green (a 1973 science fiction film directed by Richard Fleischer. Starring Charlton Heston.  The film overlays the police procedural and science fiction genres as it depicts the investigation into the brutal murder of a wealthy businessman in a dystopian future suffering from pollution, overpopulation, depleted resources, poverty, dying oceans and a hot climate due to the greenhouse effect.  In the movie, much of the population survives on processed food rations, including (“soylent green”.)   You can see the trailer on YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVpN312hYgU).

As we become compost for the new Soylent Green Economy we become more and more simply a means to an end for corporate profit.  When we die we simply become re-exploited by the necrophilic capitalists.  This vivid dystopian vision is not science fiction anymore.  It has arrived on our doorstep and is now the stark reality of a Hobbsian post-modern serfdom. 

Capitalism is a vicious economic and social system where life is as cheap as death and death is a profitable as ever.  The next time you hear about ‘death taxes’ or ‘death panels’ by corporate sophists ask them, “What about the dead peasant or dead janitor insurance policies and why can’t workers take out dead CEO insurance policies?  After all, this would serve to ‘boost’ the economy as well, wouldn’t it”?


Print Friendly

About The Author

Number of Entries : 424
  • FoonTheElder

    Dead peasant insurance policies were not set up so companies could profit from the death of employees, but to take advantage of tax breaks given to whole life insurance policies.

    The whole idea was that the company could invest in a life insurance policy for it’s employees, because companies are considered to have an insurable interest in their employees.

    This initial investment is not tax deductible but the increased earnings in the cash value builds up tax free. The company takes a loan from the policies and pays the deductible interest back into the policies. If an insured should happen to die, the proceeds are received tax free.

    The main reason was to get a tax-free build up in the income of the policy, while taking that money as a loan and paying deductible interest back into the policy. The employer could terminate the policy at any time.

    The whole idea was to not pay taxes on the build up of policy but get a deduction for the interest paid into the policy. Usually, they used younger employees because the cash value would likely build faster.

    Many companies DO take out dead CEO policies.

  • Danny Weil

    Hi, Foon

    Sure they have an insurable interest in their employees, like farmers do with cattle, or like lords did with serfs. For workers are the property of these companies, Foon. Much like cattle, cars, sor boats, except they produce for their owners.

    Sure the proceeds are tax free, most everything is tax free for th3e corporations for the corporate tax code is an accountants dream. They get around paying hardly anything at all. Look at Exxon or GE, both got tax rebates.

    As to CEO’s being insured by the company, yes, this has been going on for quite some time. For the CEO’s are owned by the company as well.

    However, try, as a worker, to take a life insurance out on your CEO. No way, for the roles cannot be reversed. Under capitalism life belongs to the corporations and thus workers cannot insure their bosses, even though they obviously have an economic interest.

    this is capitalism, the system that owns people as products. No dead CEO insurance for workers. Too bad, for then perhaps we would have a revolution and get rid of the damn system that reduces people to simply a means to an end.

    Best

    Danny

  • dino ortalani

    i remember reading on daily censored “are we a left-leaning organization?”
    this site has gone beyond left, it’s FAR left! or was it always that way? much of what i see bitches about capitalism. we ever gonna see some censored news about some asshole leftists, other than the occasional gripe about obama?

    • T Mer

      Not bitching about Capitalism – bitching about the misuses of Capitalism. Capitalism, as we as Americans grew up to think, is earning what you get, getting what you earn. If you are a company making widgets, you make a better widget, sell them for a fair price, make a profit, pay your employees, pay your stock holders who funded you in the first place, and re-invest in upgrading your widget production infrastructure. Capitalsm works best when it’s open and above board. It’s not about left and right; Presidents do not make law, congress and voters do; nor is it about personnal characteristics real or imagined. What part do you not understand? You detract from the concept of Capitalism when you let it run amok and defend those who abuse the concept.

      • weilunion

        Well, Dino the fact is that capitalism does not work at all. Look around you. What you describe is some Adam Smith notion of flea market capitalism long gone beyond industrialism and now into cybernetics and fianance.

        Capitalism is very easy to understand. The means of production is controlled by capitalists, the technology machines etc. df The forces of production under capitalism, the people, capitalists, etc. all exist within certain relations of production and they are clear. Under capitalism the worker sells their labor to the capitalist for less than they receive in value. This is called profit or surplus value that goes to the capitalist.

        The means of production are nothing but dead labor, the work of other workers. So exploitation of labor is the basis of capitalism. Now, of course capitalism evloves and you live under finance monopoly capitalism where the means of production is not controlled by a widget maker but by widget monopolies that hate competition, fight for market dominance to the point of war, drive down labor costs to get more profit and then of course control the whole thing through their government or ‘boards’ — the secret parliament.

        If you are pining for the days of the Adam Smith structure, better read Rip Van Winkle. We passed this some 250 years ago.

        You live under corporate tyranny now, the end of the lfine for capitalism, after that capitalism digs its own grave by overproduction and no demand. You aree there now as am I.

        We have factories sitting idle while workers want to work and cannot. This irrational system of production is not only wasteful but by putting profit before people, will engage in anything anti-human for profits.

        What you describe above is ‘follow the bouncing ball’ fairy tales we were told from corporate media and schsools — now almost the same thing since media-education is now the new merger

        Thanks for writing

        Danny

  • http://www.dailycensored.com weilunion

    i remember reading on daily censored “are we a left-leaning organization?”

    Yes, but what does this mean, Dino for the corporate press makes up these terms kowing they are vague, ambiguous weasel words that anyone can fill with their pre-ordained assumptions.

    this site has gone beyond left,

    What is ‘left’? See without a definition of terms you are assuming that we have the same definitions for the words we use, and we do not. This is why it is good to give metaphors, analogies or examples for the words you use in an attempt to define terms. If not, then we do not communicate.

    it’s FAR left!

    Same thing, makes no sense for wed do not know what you mean by the word Far Left.

    or was it always that way?

    Whta way? Give me a clear criteria for the word FAR left and then we can judge. The word ‘criteria’ is Latin for the development of a way to judge. it is a standard for judgng.

    much of what i see bitches about capitalism

    Know, it does not bitch it explains how it works and what it means for our lives. It is critical, yes, but ‘bitching’ again, is one of those words that implies a negative unless defined.

    . we ever gonna see some censored news about some asshole leftists, other than the occasional gripe about

    Woudl you write one? The five corporate media companies that control what you see, hear and read spend plenty of time, 24/7 talking about ‘the left’,. Look at Fox or others.

    This sit is about what is left out of the mainstream media and ‘dead peasant insurance’ does not make it in the corporate press.

    Best

    Danny

  • gina

    NOW IVE HEARD IT ALL.

    This gives me a cool idea for this year’s Halloween coustume! All I need is a set of janitor keys and some ghastly face paint, and Im good

    .I don’t know how much more sick and ghoulish it gets that this.

    Also, I say somebody needs to organize it so every Walmart employee takes out the lowest dollar amount of policy allowed, on every single store manager across our country, and then we can all simply sit back and reap the rewards. Somebodies gonna kick the bucket. Death is one thing in life you can count on.

  • weilunion

    Yes indeed Gina. Welcome to the modern world

    Danny

  • http://downloadpluss.com Poker

    Simply want to say your article is awesome. The lucidity in your post is simply spectacular and i can take for granted you are an expert on this field. Well with your permission allow me to grab your rss feed to keep up to date with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please keep up the solid work.

  • Pingback: Corporate Insurance: The Profits Of Death « Watching The World ~ In Search Of The Hundredth Monkey

© 2012 Daily Censored

Scroll to top