CENSORED IN 1978: ATOMIC LEMONS

 

CENSORED IN 1978:

NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS — ATOMIC LEMONS

The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), a national public interest group, has for years been trying to tell the story of nuclear hazards to the American public with little success.

Last year, the UCS released a report titled “Scientists’ Group Judges Federal Nuclear Safety Inspection Effort” which received little coverage.

The report criticized the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC) failure to be a tough inspector of nuclear power pants. UCS spokesman Robert D. Pollard said “Nuclear power plants are inherently hazardous. Irrespective of how safe reactors are in theory, federal inspectors cannot be sure they are built and operated safely. This report shows the NRC’s inspection efforts are biased against enforcement, undermined by political considerations, weak and ineffective.”

Contrary to the common conception that the nuclear industry is closely regulated, UCS found: only one to five percent of safety related nuclear power plant activities are inspected; NRC inspectors spend most of their time inspecting utility records, not the power plants themselves; most regulatory standards are drafted by the nuclear industry itself.

As early as 1973, the Wall Street Journal, in a well-documented article, pointed out the economic liabilities of nuclear power plants and termed them “atomic lemons,” another story which did not receive widespread coverage.

Sources for these stories were the Union of Concerned Scientists Report, November 26, 1978, and The Wall Street Journal, May 3, 1973.

(ED NOTE: Altogether, there were some 80 “censored” citations warning of nuclear problems since 1976, the year Project Censored began.)

REPORTED IN 2011: GERMANY–NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS TO CLOSE BY 2022

The BBC NEWS reported on May 30, 2011, that “Germany’s coalition government has announced a reversal of policy that will see all the country’s nuclear power plants phased out by 2022.

“The decision makes Germany the biggest industrial power to announce plans to give up nuclear energy. …

“There have been mass anti-nuclear protests across Germany in the wake of Japan’s Fukushima crisis, triggered by an earthquake and tsunami.”

(ED NOTE: On June 9, 2011, the Associated Press announced that a majority of the Swiss parliament voted to shut down the country’s five nuclear power plants by 2034. Ironically, months before the Japanese disaster, Sweden had announced plans to overturn a “near 30-year ban on atomic plans s part of a new drive to increase energy security …,” as reported by the Guardian on February 5, 2009.)

 Those who cannot remember the past

are condemned to repeat it!

–George Santayana

Print Friendly
 
 
  • Rick

    Well we have to get our energy from somewhere. China plans on building about 100 new power plants in the next few decades. So much for giving up nuclear power.

    • Dwight Hayes

      Dwight says:

      Seeing how the nuclear regulatory commission is the same one that also inspects the weopons system plants and projects, and when the military dismantles and recycles nuclear warheads to downsize our arsonal by turning them into pellots that are enriched plutonium, (which are 19,000 times hotter and more deadly than the normal uranium fuel rods), then putting them into nuclear fuel rods and sellling them to all the nuclear power plants in the world, if possible, to recoop some money, and put the people of the vicinity of the power plants in much more danger without a concience of what would happen in a disaster, I think that something should be done. You see, they built a nuclear energy plant in california in the worst spot possible on the coast. El Diablo sits on a fault line and according to USGS very close to the last weak spot in the techtonic plates on the Pacific coast of North America. All the other weak spots in this region have folded setting off serious earthquakes. Now all the the pressure is on this one weak spot, I think about from Parkfield, going south through the Sacramento delta area and maybe a little to the east. This means that the nuclear plant is almost sitting on the epicenter of the next big earthquake. Yes, just like in Japan, one of the four reactors has an enrich plutonium fuel rod in it. Now the Central Valley farms send 250,000 tons of fresh produce over the sierra mountains on a heavy gauge freight train everyday in the spring and summer, to feed most of halve of this country. In the course of an earthquake, that will, I believe, definately cause a nuclear disaster, then practicly all of the Central Valley soil will be heavily contaminated by an enriched plutonium plume. WHO THE HELL WILL FEED AMERICA THEN?