NRA spent over $11 million against candidates in 2012: Citizens United

 
The expiration of  the assault weapons ban in 2004 is directly related to the shooting of the  26 students and teachers in  Newtown CT with an AR 15 semi automatic assault rifle.
The  reason why there has been  no  legislation to ban assault weapons   during the Obama administration , despite a string of mass shootings,  is likely due to  the chilling effect of outside spending on political campaigns by the NRA. This is the direct result of the 2010 Citizens United Supreme Court decision.
According to Opensecrets.org,  in 2012 the majority of  money spent by the NRA was  on  outside spending  campaigns for or  against politicians.  In 2012  the NRA spent $19 million in outside spending campaigns for or against political candidates, while   $1 million was spent in direct contributions to political candidates.
This included  outside spending of  $11 million  against Democratic candidiates, $2 million for democratic candidates, $6 million for  Republican candidates, and $500,000 against republican candidates.
The list of candidates the NRA engaged in outside spending  campaigns AGAINST  in 2012 included: Barack Obama  $8 million, Sherrod Brown $700,00, Tim Kaine $500,000, Bill Nelson  $400,000, Claire Mccaskill $300,000, Tammy Baldwin $300,000, Richard Lugar $200,000.
Even though most of the democrats the NRA spent outside money opposing won, and a majority of the republicans the NRA spent money for  lost, the outside  spending was highly effective.
Democrats and Republicans alike  clearly understand that those who would introduce   legislation the NRA finds objectionable  will  face a massive outside spending campaign to  unseat them.
As a result of  Citizens United, corporations  such as gun manufacturers  and interest groups such as the NRA  can engage in unrestricted outside spending campaigns against  politicians, allowing them  to wield outsized influence in  Congress and obstruct legislation.
These corporations and  interest groups  can now engage in political extortion simply by having the ability to wage  outside spending campaigns against politicians who would enact legislation they perceive to be unfavorable.
Citizens United has enabled these entities to hold law makers hostage, which is why  we have no meaningful gun legislation, no meaningful  banking reform and no meaningful health care reform.
Law makers are averse to introducing  legislation which might offend   corporations .This is the lesson learned from the defeat of Richard Lugar and is  likely the reason why the assault weapons  ban being proposed by Diane Feinstein has 900 exceptions in it.
Thanks to Citizens United, the NRA, which represents gun manufacturers, dictates  national gun  policy, health insurers dictate  health policy and wall street dictates  banking policy.
Citizens United has shifted the balance of power between business and government, undermining the ability of Congress to legislate. This is the culmination of a deliberate 40 year effort to undermine effective government by conservatives, including the Supreme Court.
The NRA is little more than an astro turf group for gun manufacturers , who use  the second amendment  as an excuse to  obstruct  any legislation  which might interfere with the lucrative  profits obtained from the sale of semi automatic assault weapons.
We now  have 26 dead  students and seven teachers  because no legislation was passed to ban assault weapons following  prior mass shootings during  Obama’s first term.  This is likely the result of the NRA’s ability to engage in outside spending , thanks to Citizens United.
Print Friendly
 
admin

Share this Post

 

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts

About the author

Dr. Danny Weil is an investigative journalist, author and public interest attorney who practiced public interest law for more than twenty years and has been published in a case of first impression in California. He received the Project Censored "Most Censored" News Stories of 2009-10 award for his article: "Neoliberalism, Charter Schools and the Chicago Model / Obama and Duncan's Education Policy: Like Bush's, Only Worse," published by Counterpunch, August 24, 2009 and again in 2013 for his 2012 article, "HR 347 Would Make Many Forms of Nonviolent Protest Illegal" (http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/10-hr-347-would-make-many-forms-of-nonviolent-protest-illegal/). He writes profusely on education and for-profit predatory colleges.

 
  • DMB

    Are you truly a doctor and an educator and a lawyer? I only ask because your argument in this argument is weak, poorly constructed, vague and full of supposition. I admonish you to learn how to communicate more succinctly if you intend to wright on matters that are so grave to the people of this nation. None of the above facts are relevant to the fact that I completely disagree with you.

    • weilunion

      But you never say why you disagree. You simply attack me. Thank you for this display of uncritical thinking for it serves as evidence for the claims that many Americans are simply unable to respond to other points of view, especially those they disagree with and as such, they resort to attacks, incivility and obtuse irrationality.

    • spellme

      where did you learn to wright? I believe the correct spelling is write, let me consult my computer’s spell checker……

  • Jack Lohman

    Excellent coverage. This represents our nation’s #1 problem… political corruption. Politicians who take bribes. Now it translates to 26 deaths, 20 of whom were kids. But the assault weapon ban, had it even worked, would have eliminated only one rifle. Many kids still would have died. And the NRA, which I hate, could not have said ANYTHING that would have eased the pain. I’m surprised they even tried.

    Oh, they could have said, “no more campaign bribes!” Now THAT would have been welcome.

  • weilunion

    All the ad hominem attacks are fallacious. Deal with the claims in the argument. but alas, in the age of irrationality we find that such fallacies serve well the purveyors of anti-rationalism. In critical thinking we confront claims, we do not engage in fallacies. This is the providence of the unschooled mind.

  • Jack Lohman

    Danny, pls contact me at jelohman at gmail dot com

    Jack Lohman