You Are Here: Home » Education » Paul Vallas, vassal and executioner of public schools: Dateline New Orleans, Haiti and Philadelphia

Paul Vallas, vassal and executioner of public schools: Dateline New Orleans, Haiti and Philadelphia


Readers might remember the distasteful case of gun-for-hire, former Superintendent of the Philadelphia School District and New Orleans School District, Paul Vallas and his erstwhile dismantling of New Orleans’ school district after Hurricane Katrina.  Vallas was on hand to help fire the entire New Orleans unionized teacher’s labor force and impose conservative, Paul T. Hill’s dreadful disaster capitalist policies on the fledgling school district (

 As I wrote back in 2009, this was all an effort to smash and grab districts all over the country and force them to submit to privatization through charter schools.

Vallas was also very successful as a serial dismantler in Philadelphia where he once ran the schools with similar success for the business community, the philanthro-pirates and reactionary forces bent on denying our nation’s children an education (

Perhaps one of Vallas great successes for the one-percent was his work on behalf of the privatizers in Haiti after the earthquake where he was paid a hefty sum to sprinkle his magic privatization dust all over the earthquake torn country.  Vallas loves natural disasters and is always on hand when disaster capitalism is in the works; Haiti was no different.

According to Doorwall:

“Along with financial support from the IDB and other donors, the Haitian government will also receive technical assistance from leading experts in education reform. One key advisor will be Paul Vallas, who led the transformation of the New Orleans public schools system after Hurricane Katrina.”(

Doorwall also claimed, correctly:

“By always appearing to be  ”saving” people and systems, the new breed of venture philanthropists find tremendous opportunities in places like Haiti to reform them along lines which will be profitable in the future (

Now, Paul Vallas, educational executioner for the one-percent, is back in the news.  This time it is Philadelphia again but the game plan are schools all over the world.

From Quebec to England, from Chile to the United States, from Spain to Greece and from Italy to France, Western capitaslist countries are refusing to provide opportunities for working people and the poor to get an education.  The rulers of these countries know that their time is limited and that education, and especially an education for liberation, will move the clock forward on the demise of the one percent. 

The attack on public education is a “package deal” that includes k-12 and higher institutions of learning.  Privatization is the public policy but privation is the desired learning outcome.

May 4, 2012

Philadelphia Public Schools Being Dismantled

Larry Miller’s blog:

Who’s Killing Philly Public Schools?

Daniel Denvir

City Paper

Evan M. Lopez and Neal Santos

Thomas Knudsen, the man who was temporarily put in charge of Philadelphia schools in January, was running late to last Monday’s press conference.

He had been delivering the same presentation all day, and doomsday rumors had already leaked: The plan he was about to lay out would dismantle the central office and parcel out school management, at least in part, to private companies.

Knudsen, paid $150,000 to hold the newly created post of Chief Recovery Officer through June, made a point of shaking the hand of every single reporter in the room before beginning his presentation. “Philadelphia public schools is not the school district,” he announced, laying out the five-year plan before the School Reform Commission (SRC). “There’s a redefinition, and we’ll get to that later.”

He got to it, using terms like “portfolios,” “modernization,” “right-sizing,” “entrepreneurialism” and “competition.” In short, it was a plan to shutter 40 schools next year, and an additional six every year thereafter until 2017. The remaining schools would be herded into “achievement networks” of 20 to 30 schools; public and private groups would compete to manage the networks. And the central office would be reduced to a skeleton crew of about 200. (About 1,000-plus positions existed in 2010, and district HQ has already eliminated more than a third of those.) Charter schools, the plan projects, would teach an estimated 40 percent of students by 2017.

The plan is bold — after all, closing just eight schools this year prompted an uproar. It’s also terrifying, says former Philadelphia School District superintendent David Hornbeck, considering the poor academic records and corruption at many charter schools. “What is being proposed, in effect, is ‘charterizing’ the whole district, when there is a lot of evidence that at best [charters] have no positive effect on student achievement, and there is a lot of evidence they cost more,” he tells City Paper. And “charters in many instances, in Philadelphia and elsewhere, have served private interests — sometimes of public officials.”

What’s even more startling than the drastic overhaul proposal is who engineered it. The plan was prepared with the assistance of Boston Consulting Group, a major global-business consultancy and school “right-sizing” mastermind. Boston’s previous accomplishments include recommending that New Orleans, which has decimated its teachers’ union and put most schools under charter control, create the exact same species of achievement networks in 2006. Last year, Boston also recommended that Australian education leaders close schools and cut spending. Indeed, Boston recommendations seem like a forgone conclusion: Their website touts “reform” hallmarks like evaluating student achievement through standardized tests and undermining traditional teacher certification.

It’s unclear what Boston Consulting Group actually did with the $1.5 million contract paid for by the William Penn Foundation, given their apparent cut-and-paste approach to tackling Philly’s school problems. Indeed, a former Boston employee has publicly described the company’s approach as merely “force-fit[ting] analysis to a conclusion” — in this case, the dismantling of the school system.

Another goal of Boston could be enriching its allies, or scoring them political victories. Former Boston executives and consultants now hold senior posts at charter-school networks like KIPP — which could well apply to manage a Philly achievement network — and Broad Center, an urban schools executive recruiter and trainer and a leading proponent of corporate-inspired reform.

Boston Consulting may describe itself as an innovator, with its private-sector-inspired experiments. But to longtime Philly public school watchers, this just looks like the latest attack on the city’s public education. Since 2001 — when the commonwealth swooped in and took over, but did not fix, the district — Philly schools have suffered the blatant mismanagement of former Superintendent Arlene Ackerman, the corruption of charter operators, the unchecked greed of for-profit education companies and, in recent years, debilitating state budget cuts and a leadership vacuum from the district and the city. Each of these players has done damage; none has come close to addressing the district’s core problems of insufficient funding and widespread poverty among students and families. If Philly’s public school system does eventually crumble, all of these culprits will share a portion of the blame.

“Executive skills and experience.” That was what Knudsen was supposed to bring to the table as chief recovery officer, according to SRC chairman Pedro Ramos. After all, he had turned around a financially troubled Philadelphia Gas Works. But “executive skills” might not be enough to heal the school district. Setting aside academic problems — only about 60 percent of students graduate; less than 60 percent score proficient in reading and math; and 80 percent are “economically disadvantaged,” a key indicator of poor performance — the district’s financial woes appear almost insurmountable. Philadelphia already raised property taxes 3.85 percent last year, to direct an estimated $53 million to city schools. Ultimately, Knudsen and his team will need to close a $218 million deficit for the coming year, part of a $1.1 billion cumulative deficit by 2017.

But even Boston’s plan, to butcher and sell off the district for its parts, is predicated upon a reluctant City Council forking over $91 million in additional property-tax revenue. A separate ruling by the State Tax Equalization Board, which found the city’s valuation methods to be illegal, could cost the district tens of millions more.

Mayor Michael Nutter has called on Council to approve the additional funding — and announced his support for Knudsen’s plan. It is “stark but realistic,” he said, suggesting that critics “grow up and deal with” it.

Philadelphia Federation of Teachers president Jerry Jordan, however, called it “a cynical, right-wing and market-driven plan to privatize public education.” And New York University education historian Diane Ravitch said Knudsen’s plan has no basis in research, and criticized Nutter for giving up on schools. “I think he should be advocating for public education,” she told CP.

The plan cuts $156 million from personnel costs and $149 million from payments to charters. And Knudsen threatened to outsource all custodial, maintenance and transportation work to private companies unless union workers could underbid them. “There are other people out there who do these things, if not better, then at least less expensively,” he said.

This seems to now be the mantra governing public education in cities like Philadelphia: Other people do these things maybe not better, but cheaper.

Last summer’s $629 million shortfall, fueled by $1 billion in statewide budget cuts to education delivered by Republican legislators and Gov. Tom Corbett, led to the elimination of 3,800 teacher and staff positions, including 1,300 layoffs. Layoffs have continued this school year: About 100 nurses got pink slips, along with 90 school police officers and 43 bilingual counseling assistants. Advocates say the counselors are crucial to preventing violence at schools like South Philly High, where the district pledged big changes after attacks on Asian-American students in 2009. South Philly lost more than $1.5 million in funding this year.

Cuts have also forced districts statewide to depend evermore on property taxes, exacerbating the inequity between rich and poor municipalities.

CP asked Knudsen if the five-year plan would address the district’s central problems: too few teachers, too few school police, too few extracurriculars, too few libraries.

“The things that other networks do in other parts of the country,” said Knudsen, “is that these networks attract resources.” It was a startling admission: Like high-end charters, Philly schools would panhandle for donations from rich people. On prodding, Knudsen conceded, philanthropy wasn’t the only hope. The economy could also get better.

But by then Boston’s decentralization plan will have irreparably transformed the district.

“There just isn’t the political will to give the resources to people who aren’t perceived as having political power,” says Nijmie Dzurinko, former head of the Philadelphia Student Union (PSU). That has been true for decades. But this Sunday at Mother Bethel AME Church, a gathering of about 150 teachers, parents and community members — organized by the church-based advocacy group POWER — pledged a fight. “The mayor, the governor and the SRC are not making the right decisions for our children,” Rev. Kevin Johnson of Bright Hope Baptist Church preached to the energized pews.

On Aug. 18, 2011, just four days before she would resign, Philadelphia Schools Superintendent Arlene Ackerman sauntered into an auditorium to the tune of Sade’s “Is It a Crime?” and delivered a provocative defense of her controversial tenure to a group of district principals. “Is it a crime to stand up for children instead of stooping down into the political sandbox and selling our children for a politician’s campaign victory?” She dared the SRC to fire her — knowing that her departure was already being arranged.

It was the capstone of a melodramatic, and traumatic, three-year tenure. CP would soon reveal that Ackerman spent taxpayer money on pro-Ackerman propaganda, including protest signs and a farewell tribute video produced by three communications staffers who collectively took home $440,000 in salaries.

Ackerman liked to pay administrators generously, but she said it paid off. That summer, Philadelphia schools celebrated their ninth straight year of test-score gains.

But the acrimony, protest and theater overshadowed a less entertaining problem. The month before, the Public School Notebook revealed that the state was investigating 29 Philadelphia schools (among 89 statewide) for cheating on standardized tests. By March 2012, the scope of the scandal had widened dramatically: Citywide, 56 schools — including one in five district schools — are under investigation, including 11 of the city’s top-tier Vanguard Schools.

And there was the financial problem: District chief financial officer Michael Masch and Ackerman did not like each other, and reportedly stopped discussing budgetary matters in spring 2010. That October, Masch reported that the district faced a shortfall of more than $250 million as stimulus money ran out. Yet by January 2011, he still insisted to the SRC: “We don’t have a budget crisis.”

At the same time, money was flying out the door. That month, the district paid out $63 million to Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Goldman Sachs Capital Markets and Wells Fargo Bank to cancel a budgetary gamble gone horribly wrong. In 2004, at the height of the pre-recession financial deregulation adventure, the district took out something called “interest-rate swaps” on a number of bonds. The swaps were supposed to protect the district from high interest rates. But interest rates crashed, and the district lost an astonishing $71.87 million, according to the liberal Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center.

Then came Corbett’s announcement of $1 billion in education cuts. The district’s shortfall grew to $629 million. Critics pilloried Ackerman for poor planning and for spending money on pet projects. Ackerman, on her way out with a $900,000 severance package, blamed Masch.

The public memory of Ackerman is defined by her authoritarianism and grandstanding. Low points include accusations launched against Asian student victims at South Philly High, retaliation against whistleblowers speaking out on improper contracting, tumult following the removal of a popular principal at West Philly High, the persecution of Audenried teacher Hope Moffett, who spoke out against charter conversions, and, of course, the propaganda machine. Ackerman’s legacy is still being hashed out: the Renaissance Schools turnaround program for low-performing schools, which turned some schools over to charters, is still in effect.

But, as that drama played out, most people forgot one important thing: The state, not the city, was in charge the entire time — and it still is.

On the morning of Nov. 29, 2001, hundreds of students walked out of class and into Philadelphia streets to protest the state takeover — enacted via the General Assembly in purported response to budget woes and poor performance — and a plan to put for-profit Edison Schools Inc. in charge of the central office and 60 low-performing schools.

The takeover, originally scheduled for Nov. 30, was pushed back to Dec. 21. But the walkouts, coordinated by PSU and Youth United for Change, continued on Dec. 18, and U.S Rep. Chaka Fattah sought, and failed to get, an injunction blocking Edison contract. He alleged a conflict of interest: Former Gov. Tom Ridge had contracted Edison to study privatization, they had recommended privatization and they were now poised to take the business.

Street, too, criticized the takeover, but he soon reached a new deal with Ridge’s replacement, Gov. Mark Schweiker: The city would get $75 million in aid and two appointments, instead of one, to the five-member SRC; Edison would not take over district headquarters; and the number of schools turned over to them would be reduced.

Even scaled back, it would be American public education’s greatest foray into privatization, and the largest state takeover, too.

The protests against the new SRC continued into 2002, and City Council, Philadelphia Federation of Teachers, PSU and NAACP filed more lawsuits. But on April 18, a student blockade couldn’t stop privatization: Edison got 20 schools, and 22 schools were handed over to other private companies.

“I’m a corporate guy, and the bottom line is that you have a firm that has systemwide experience,” said then-SRC chairman James Nevels at the time. “What we wanted to do was capture that experience.” That experience included Chester Upland, where Nevels had served on the state-appointed Board of Control that gave Edison control of eight of nine district schools. Four years later, Edison left Chester. After a lackluster performance, the for-profit “educational management organizations” left Philly, too.

Former Mayor Ed Rendell, then running for governor, endorsed the takeover, but told the Inquirer, “We must not lose sight of what was the real issue . . . adequate funding for all of Pennsylvania’s schools.”

Of course, it’s been a long time since Philly schools had close to adequate funding — and for the past decade, city leaders have not fought much to rectify that. Amid the tumult of protests, Street terminated Philly’s last vocal demand for more money when he withdrew a federal lawsuit contending that state underfunding to Philadelphia schools constituted race discrimination.

The lawsuit, filed under feisty Superintendent David Hornbeck, tried to accomplish in federal court what had already failed at the state level. Pennsylvania Supreme Court had in 1999 ruled against two lawsuits — one filed by the Philadelphia School District, the city, the NAACP and parents; the second filed by the Association of Rural and Small Schools — contending that Harrisburg’s inequitable funding violated the state constitution’s requirement that the “General Assembly … provide for the maintenance and support of a thorough and efficient system of public education to serve the needs of the Commonwealth.”

The district faced an $80 million budget shortfall at the time, exacerbated by policy changes under Ridge and Gov. Robert Casey that reduced the share of education funding accorded to poor districts. The funding gap between Philly and suburban school districts had doubled in just six years, and Philly had needs that wealthy schools did not — involving day care, security, immigrant students who do not speak English and, most importantly, students who come to school with more problems and less preparation.

“It’s not like prior to that Philadelphia got its fair share,” Hornbeck tells CP from Baltimore, where he now lives. “It’s just that they got even more gouged.”

Hornbeck was a civil rights leader for Philadelphia’s children: With Rendell’s backing, he refused to make further cuts and threatened to let the schools shutdown. In fact, the initial move toward state takeover, 1998′s Act 46, was the response of an angry legislature to block Hornbeck from carrying out this threat. In the process, teachers lost the right to strike. After Hornbeck’s June 2000 resignation, there would be no serious demand for fair funding from a city or school district leader.

In 2001, Hornbeck took his fight statewide, founding Good Schools Pennsylvania to mobilize behind Gov. Rendell’s plan for increased funding. Today, school and city leadership implement Corbett’s plans instead of fighting them.

“The real culprit,” says Hornbeck, “has less to do with any kind of mismanagement at the school district and much more to do with the continued shortchanging of the district in financial terms by the state. The biggest indictment that can be brought against folks in the city is the lack of advocacy, aggressiveness, on behalf of the kids.”

In 2002, poor students of color became the talk of Washington. President George W. Bush signed No Child Left Behind (NCLB), requiring aggressive interventions at schools where students failed to make Adequate Yearly Progress on tests.

Testifying in favor of the law was Superintendent Paul Vallas, who took over Philly schools in 2002. Vallas broke with teachers’ unions and superintendents across the state, who correctly predicted that the law would become a hated one. They foresaw that teachers would give up an ever-larger part of the school day to teach to the test (or as we now see, cheat to the test), while science, arts, social studies, physical education and recess were winnowed out.

Vallas eagerly embraced the new law. He turned over three schools — Shoemaker, Pickett and Thomas — to Mastery Charter Schools, a private nonprofit, and paid millions of dollars to Kaplan for a test-prep curriculum.

In recent years, President Barack Obama has doubled down on NCLB, despite criticizing the law during his 2008 campaign. His “Race to the Top” grants condition federal funding on increasing the importance of high-stakes tests, and on the removal of constraints on charter growth.

So the state took over Philly schools, and the federal government took on a growing role in classroom management. Neither, however, would take responsibility for funding the schools. Gov. Rendell, at least, did try. In June 2006, the legislature voted to ask an important question: Just how much money did Pennsylvania schools need, and how much were they receiving? Pennsylvania, according to the “costing out” study, needed to spend $4.6 billion more on schools per year, a 26.8 percent increase. Philly, with a poor tax base and dire needs, required nearly $1 billion more each year. Armed with data, Rendell in 2008 cajoled the legislature into directing resources to under-funded districts.

“That was my line in the sand every year in the budget,” Rendell tells CP. “That’s why in 2008 and 2009 we had the long budget deadlocks. And I eventually won.”

However, as Corbett eagerly points out, the second year’s funding was backed by $654 million in temporary stimulus dollars. His cuts have, for now, reversed that progress.

“He’s dealing with the effects of the recession,” says Rendell. And “dealing with the fact that he took a no-tax pledge. … He told us exactly what he’s going to do and he’s living up to his word. For better or worse.”

The state legislature passed a bill legalizing privately managed public schools in 1997. Since then, though, charter schools have failed to live up to their utopian promise. A Stanford University study found that students at almost half of Pennsylvania’s charters performed “significantly worse” than their peers at traditional schools.

Still, there are good charters. Hundreds of students enter a lottery each year for a seat at Center City’s Independence Charter School, a top-tier school whose board is packed with well-connected, affluent members. This, presumably, is the sort of fundraising prowess that Knudsen hopes for.

But other charters depend on young and inexperienced teachers who are asked to work very, very hard. “The workload is really high,” says one Mastery teacher, a Teach for America participant. This will not be his career. “Most of the teachers are under 35. That pace is not sustainable.”

It may not be sustainable for the district either. Last month, Commonwealth Court ruled the district illegally capped enrollment at the Walter D. Palmer Learning Partners Charter School; it must pay out $1.3 million as a result. The implications could be disastrous: If the district can’t negotiate charter growth, it cannot budget.



Print Friendly

About The Author

Dr. Danny Weil is a public interest attorney who has practiced for more than twenty years and has been published in a case of first impression in California. He is no longer active as a lawyer but has written seven books on education, has taught second grade in South Central LA, PS 122, taught K-1 migrant children in Santa Maria, California and Guadalupe, California, taught in the California Youth Authority to first and second degree murderers and taught for seventeen years at Allan Hancock Junior College in Santa Maria, CA. in the philosophy department. Dr. Weil holds a BA in Political Economics and Philosophy, a multi-subject bilingual credential in education (he is fluent in Spanish) and a PhD in Critical Thinking. Dr. Weil was one of 226 legal residents in Nicaragua, where he worked for the Ministry of Culture under the Sandanistas in1985. Dr. Weil is an expert in curriculum design for critical thinking at all levels of education, from K-adult. He is also an internationally recognized speaker on critical thinking and pedagogy, having written many books on the subject. Danny Weil is a writer for Project Censored and Daily Censored. He received the Project Censored "Most Censored" News Stories of 2009-10 award for his article: "Neoliberalism, Charter Schools and the Chicago Model / Obama and Duncan's Education Policy: Like Bush's, Only Worse," published by Counterpunch, August 24, 2009. Dr. Weil has published more than seven books on education in the past 20 years. You can also read much more about all aspects of the privatization of the educational means of production and the for-profit, predatory colleges in his writings found at,,, and Project where he has covered the issue of the privatization of education for years. He can be reached at [email protected] His new book, an encyclopedia on charter schools, entitled: "Charter School Movement: History, Politics, Policies, Economics and Effectiveness," 641 pages, was published in August of 2009 by Grey House Publishing, New York, and provides a scathing look at the privatization of education through charter schools. He is currently a member of the Truthout Public Intellectual Project. "The project is designed to provide a platform for the general public to think carefully about a range of social problems that affect their lives. It will also allow a generation of scholars to reflect on their own intellectual practices, discourses and understanding of what it might mean to embrace their role as public intellectuals" (

Number of Entries : 434

© 2012 Daily Censored

Scroll to top