COUP D’ETATE BY JUDICIAL BRANCH AND WASHINGTON D.C. BELTWAY LOBBYIST/ATTORNEYS WHO BECOME GOVERNMENT ATTORNEYS.
As the election will be held on November 6th, in less than six days, we are aware that our citizens are faced with the real crisis in that our Republic is in danger due to their complacency to the expansion of the power of government and the control of the oligarchy of Washington D.C. Beltway Lobbyist/Attorneys of both parties, all back stopped by the lack of an impartial Judicial Branch and access to a trial by jury for malfeasance.
In this context, history has show that disregard of the limitations and prohibitions of any constitution has never been lost on either despots, or oligarchies who wish to undertake a coup d’etate–by the sudden overthrow of a Constitutional government by a small group of persons in authority.
To do so, both government attorney and judges must agree on certain policies in violation of separation of power by disregarding the Void ab initio Order Doctrine.Presentation of Jan 9, 2010, to NOVA members of VA General Assembly
This was confirmed during the Nuremberg trials by Van Der Essen, a member of the Official Belgian Commission for War Crimes who testified that upon invading Belgium the Nazis immediately went about the task of dismantling the legal framework separating government power. 6 Trial of the Major War Criminal Before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 14 November 1945-1 October 1946. 534-35 (Testimony of Van der Essen 4 Feb 1946).
The acts of government attorneys and judges conspiring in ex parte secret meeting to act outside of their employment, authority, and jurisdiction based on financial interest, cronyism, and animosity, evoke the history of the sorry acts of German judges, lawyers and law schools violation of the rights of citizens under the German Constitution-which was a key part in aiding the inhuman acts of Hitler and NAZI, because, “[by] the time the gas vans came and the human slaughter factories were built in Auschwitz and the other death camps, the murder of the six million Jews and other persecuted minorities was done completely within the framework of German law.” Professor Michael Bazyler, The Legacy of the Holocaust and Lessons for Today: Research for a New Textbook Holocaust, Genocide, and the Law.
Thus, what the Nazis understood, so too did our Founding Fathers, that is by the violation of the mandate of separation of power the clear lessons from history show that, “[o]nce certain checks and balances are destroyed, and once certain institutions have been intimidated, the pressure that can turn an open society into a closed one . . . . ” Naomi Wolf, The End of America: Letter of Warning To A Young Patriot, p. 14, Chelsea Green Publishing, Vermont, 2007.
Regarding the evidence of abuse of delegated power by the Judicial Branch to issue and apply unconstitutional court rules, more than 225 years ago another Virginian, Patrick Henry, stated that, ”[p]ower is the great evil with which we are contending. We have divided power between three branches of government and erected checks and balances to prevent abuse of power. However, where is the check on the power of the judiciary? If we fail to check the power of the judiciary, I predict that we will eventually live under judicial tyranny”