You Are Here: Home » Daily Journal (Opinion) » COUP D’ETATE BY JUDICIAL BRANCH AND WASHINGTON D.C. BELTWAY LOBBYIST/ATTORNEYS WHO BECOME GOVERNMENT ATTORNEYS.

COUP D’ETATE BY JUDICIAL BRANCH AND WASHINGTON D.C. BELTWAY LOBBYIST/ATTORNEYS WHO BECOME GOVERNMENT ATTORNEYS.

As the election will be held on November 6th, in less than six days, we are aware that our citizens are faced with the real crisis in that our Republic is in danger due to their complacency to the expansion of the power of government and the control of the oligarchy of Washington D.C. Beltway Lobbyist/Attorneys of both parties, all back stopped by the lack of an impartial Judicial Branch and access to a trial by jury for malfeasance.

In this context, history has show that disregard of the limitations and prohibitions of any constitution has never been lost on either despots, or oligarchies who wish to undertake a coup d’etate–by the sudden overthrow of a Constitutional government by a small group of persons in authority.

To do so, both government attorney and judges must agree on certain policies in violation of separation of power by disregarding the Void ab initio Order Doctrine.Presentation of Jan 9, 2010, to NOVA members of VA General Assembly

This was confirmed during the Nuremberg trials by Van Der Essen, a member of the Official Belgian Commission for War Crimes who testified that upon invading Belgium the Nazis immediately went about the task of dismantling the legal framework separating government power. 6 Trial of the Major War Criminal Before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 14 November 1945-1 October 1946. 534-35 (Testimony of Van der Essen 4 Feb 1946).

The acts of government attorneys and judges conspiring in ex parte secret meeting to act outside of their employment, authority, and jurisdiction based on financial interest, cronyism, and animosity, evoke the history of the sorry acts of German judges, lawyers and law schools violation of the rights of citizens under the German Constitution-which was a key part in aiding the inhuman acts of Hitler and NAZI, because, “[by] the time the gas vans came and the human slaughter factories were built in Auschwitz and the other death camps, the murder of the six million Jews and other persecuted minorities was done completely within the framework of German law.” Professor Michael Bazyler, The Legacy of the Holocaust and Lessons for Today: Research for a New Textbook Holocaust, Genocide, and the Law.

Thus, what the Nazis understood, so too did our Founding Fathers, that is by the violation of the mandate of separation of power the clear lessons from history show that, “[o]nce certain checks and balances are destroyed, and once certain institutions have been intimidated, the pressure that can turn an open society into a closed one . . . . ” Naomi Wolf, The End of America: Letter of Warning To A Young Patriot, p. 14, Chelsea Green Publishing, Vermont, 2007.

Regarding the evidence of abuse of delegated power by the Judicial Branch to issue and apply unconstitutional court rules, more than 225 years ago another Virginian, Patrick Henry, stated that, ”[p]ower is the great evil with which we are contending. We have divided power between three branches of government and erected checks and balances to prevent abuse of power. However, where is the check on the power of the judiciary? If we fail to check the power of the judiciary, I predict that we will eventually live under judicial tyranny”


Print Friendly

About The Author

Civil Rights Advocate

I was born and grew up in the South Bronx, New York City. After Viet Nam, I was a System Engineer with UNIVAC/Sperry, while working for my BA from Boise State University and my JD from the University of Colorado Boulder, Flemmings School of Law. Based on being a civil rights activist, after graduation I received appointments in both the Carter and Reagan Administrations (in the latter I was SES Director of the Office of Civil Rights for the USDA). I am fluent in Spanish and business fluent in French.After my two White Housse appointments, and serving as Acting Legal Counsel to the Office of Personnel, Washington, D.C., in 1983 I accepted the position of Contracts Administrator/Assistant General Counsel with Morrison Knudsen International on their $2 Billion Cerrejon Port/Mine Project in the Republic of Colombia.In 1987 as a member of the Virginia State Bar, the Supreme Court of Virginia, the U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. Courts of Appeals for the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 11th, DC, and Fed. Circuits, U.S. District Ct. for the E.D. of VA, and the U.S. Tax Court, I established in Barranquilla, Colombia a multinational law practice to provide legal service to both nonresident U.S. and Colombian citizens in the United States.The success and unique of my law practice was confirmed: first, when he was retained as Legal Representative of SSA LP/Armada Co’s Board of Directors (“SSA LP et al.”), to manage contract litigation on a claim to Treasure Troves against the Government of the Republic of Colombia (“GOC”), described by Congressmen Benjamin A. Gilman, Dan Burton, and Phil M. Crane, as the "largest private claim by American citizens against a foreign state pending in the world;” second, when the Clerk of the U.S. Supreme Court stated when I prevailed in Martinez v. Lamagno and DEA, 515 U.S. 417 (1995)(confirming the right to an evidentiary hearing of the U. S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) “scope of authority” certification), it was “the only instance in recent memory that a lawyer with an address outside the United States has argued a case before the Court.” Tony Mauro, Legal Times, “Testing the Limits of Sovereign Immunity” (1995); third, when the court of Colombia held in my contract suit, that SSA LP et al., had a contract right to 50% of the value of the Treasure Troves; and, fourth, when I published newsletters and litigated cases on the civil rights of nonresident U.S./Colombian citizens under the U.S. Constitution and federal statutes vis-a-vis illegal DOJ’s policies under the stewardship of then Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder, i.e. Lopez v. First Union, 129 F3.rd. 1186 (11th Cir. 1997)(successfully stopped DOJ’s unlawful searches of U.S. bank records based only on being Hispanic); Organization JD Ltda. v. Assist U.S. Attorney Arthur P. Hui and DOJ, 2nd Cir. No. 93-6019 and 96-6145 (holding that DOJ’s U.S. Attorney can be sued for violation of Electronic Communication Privacy Act); and, Cooperative Multiactive de Empeados de Distribuidores de Drogas “Coopservir Ltda.” v. Newcomb, et al., D.C. Cir. No 99-5190, S Ct. No 99-1893 (District Judge directing DOJ to consider argument of violation by issuance of prohibitive bill of attainder).Since 2008 to the present I have been in litigation against the conflicting financial interest of Beltway Lobbyists/Attorneys with my choate statutory lien on the Treasure Trove, the cronyism with HOLDER and JOHN G. ROBERTS, as well as other Beltway Lobbyist/Attorneys, and animosity toward me for filing suits against government employees,including judge, for violation of nonresident U.S./Colombian citizens rights. The evidence confirms an ongoing business conspiracy, constitutional tort, and interstate racketeering enterprise of government attorneys and judges acting outside the scope of employment, authority, jurisdiction, and not in the interest of the United States to systematically deny me access to an impartial court by obstruction of justice and misprision of the felony of treason by the use of unconstitutional court rules Part Six § IV of the S.Ct. VA issued in violation of Art. VI §§ 1, 5 and 7 of the VA Const., to reciprocally enforce void ab initio orders in violation of the Internal Revenue Code, Social Security Act, ant the Rules Enabling Act.

Number of Entries : 28

© 2012 Daily Censored

Scroll to top