Although to some the “sound and fury” of this November 2010 election is important to getting change, citizens are beginning to realize that to bring meaningful protection for our Republic, they must act to demand that when their respective Congressman/Senator return to the Beltway that there is compliance with the mandate to control expenditures and operations.
Quire, why after the 2006 and 2008 election are we spending $ Billion a month on the war in Afghanistan-when so many are suffering here? Why do we have 50,000 troops plus private mercenaries in IRAQ-when we have no work here? Why when we still have not repaired the damages of Katrina do we fund a military/industrial complex which citizens can control?
I argue that the key to holding the government employees accountable there must demand an investigation of the collusion of government attorneys and judges acting outside of their authority by use of the U.S. Judicial Conference. The evidence confirms that there is a coup d’etat by the legal profession to deprive citizens of the rights and protections of the Constitution by promulgation of court rule violative of the Rules Enabling Act.
History confirms that all tyrants and tyranny use a semblance of legality. “Decency, security and liberty alike demand that government officials shall be subjected to the rules of conduct that are command to the citizen. In a government of laws, existence of the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our government is the potent, omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy.” Olmstad v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928).
Consequently, irrespective of the results of the election-since the abuse of power has occurred by both Democratic and Republican Administration and Congresses, I will bring an action once the new Congress is seated under: ■ §1203(b) of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, (26 USC §7804, notes); ■ §§ 7214, 7431, 7433 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. §§ 7214, 7431, 7433); ■ the Racketeering Influenced and Corruption Organization Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962 ( c) & (d), and 1964( c ); and, ■ the First, Fifth and Seventh Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, for damages and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 1964(a) and 3771, for equitable relief as a victim of a retaliatory conspiracy by Eric Holder et al., begun in 2003 from District of Colombia to deprive me of my rights to due process, equal protection of the laws, access to an impartial court, and to a jury trial: (a) to litigate for damages for the obstruction of his visitation rights as a father under Treaty and VA UCCJEA (see http://home.earthlink.net/isidoror ); (b) to litigate for damages for the business conspiracy to deprive Rodriguez of his perfected Virginia statutory Attorney’s Lien; and, ( c ) litigate for damages for the deriving Rodriguez of his property rights in his multinational law offices and employment as an independent practitioner, by an interstate racketeering enterprise to give reciprocal effect to the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board (“Board”) illegal and void disbarment so to conceal as accessory after the fact and misprision of the felony of treason of law of Virginia (see http://home.earthlink.net/~treason), by “oppression under color of law” etc. of named employees of the IRS and U.S. Tax Court in collusion with named government employees, all acting outside of their authority.